Kim Chestney has discovered how intuition can work with quantum indeterminacy to revolutionize a person’s life. In this amazing interview, she lays out just how this can be made to happen–how we can actually synchronize our minds with the fundamental indeterminacy of the universe to turn intuition into an astonishing super-power. Starting with an amazing story of meeting a medium at the UK’s legendary Hull Fair in 1996, she tells us how and why the future can be known, and to what extent, and what we can do to bring this greater reality into our lives.
This unusual interview is powerful because it is empowering–so much so that, toward it’s end, Whitley actually uses one of the techniques in real time, with fascinating and provocative results.
Visit Kim at KimChestney.com.
Don’t miss the Illumination Code! To get it, click here.
Subscribers, to watch the subscriber version of the video, first log in then click on Dreamland Subscriber-Only Video Podcast link.
Thank you so much for your outstanding interview with Kim. It was fun an very untangling to say the least. Amazing energy throughout the whole show!!
A thoroughly enjoyable and frankly relaxing interview that has come along just at the right time for me.
It compliments the release of Mr Strieber’s new book of poetry and I for one shall be buying a copy BUT is it possible to obtain a signed copy?
Yes, it’d be easy to just click and order from Amazon but I’d rather pay extra for a signed copy if possible. I understand this will cost me more but I’m more than happy to give up more to receive a signed copy. My signed copy of Communion makes my heart vibrate in a most pleasing way.
Peace.
I always enjoy finding those that are on the same page as I am—because they are few and far between, especially in terms of science and spirituality. Both are a large part of me, and for years there was a certain loneliness in looking for others that I could communicate with on another level. When I finally ‘let go’ of the idea of finding others that fit that ‘mold’, of course they began to show up…a little over 20 years ago. About that time, I also got a download where I realized that that I had access…to everything. That was reinforced when not long after, I was shown ‘The Great Library’ and told that I could visit it at any time.
I don’t think there was one thing that was said by Kim that I could not relate to. Yay!
Thank You for this fantastic interview. Just what I needed to hear…right now.
I’m confused by the reference to Gypsy Rose Lee, where Kim said she had “been one of those” or something like that, and ended with “not like a scary gypsy.”
Been one of what? Why would a gypsy (now a pejorative term for Roma of course) be expected to be scary? Why would a woman who took Gypsy for a stage name have anything to do with gypsies anyway? It sounds like there’s something more behind these comments. ?
I interpreted Kim’s ‘scary Gypsy’ aside as a reference to other people being silly in holding on to their fear of strangers or outsiders.
Having worked in Germany and in particular in some quite rural areas, I can relate to the way locals often ‘stiffen up’ when dealing with a ‘foreigner with a funny accent’. While my German isn’t fluent, I get by just fine but must sound awfully dense with my British provincial accent.
So, xenophobic comment? Nooo, not at all. Just a mirthful observation on the way people inevitably interact and quite harmless.
Try going to Switzerland and speaking German with a foreign accent and see how far that gets you, lol. When the other person’s head tilts sideways, you know this is going to be an uphill struggle (what better place than Switzerland for that!).
Peace.
Thid reminds me of my French. My wife and son both spoke French quite well but when we were in France together, they would refuse to speak in order to amuse themselves with my attempts. I have to say that the French have a reputation for being particularly difficult with people who can’t speak their language adequately, but I was apparently so funny that it was all quite hilarious and a good bit of fun for everyone else. Since then, my streetcorner French has improved enough for me to be able to get around.
Thank you so much Whitley and Kim Chestney for this interview. There is so much DIVINE WISDOM here. While listening to Kim talk about her cards, my thoughts went to ‘The High Priestess’ in the Tarot cards. I was also thinking of Edgar Cayce as well and what he had to say about soulmates.
Kevin J. Todeschi:
Edgar Cayce believed that we have a number of soul mates, i.e., people with whom we had incarnated before and with whom we could create a positive relationship. These people would assist us in our soul development. According to Cayce, a soul mate is not an individual’s other half that somehow enables that person to become complete. We are attracted to another person at a soul level not because that person is our unique complement, but because by being with that individual we are somehow provided with an impetus to become whole ourselves. Cayce’s reading affirmed that his wife Gertrude was his soulmate and marriage partner.
THEN:
The Goddess card in tarot embodies divine feminine energy and intuitive wisdom. “I believe whether male or female the intuitive needs to be fully developed.”
The WAITE RIDER TAROT:
The High Priestess in the Tarot cards is a symbol of:
Intuition: Signifies deep inner knowledge and trusting one’s instincts.
Mysteries: Represents the unveiling of hidden truths and spiritual insights.
Feminine energy: Emphasizes the importance of intuition, empathy, and nurturing qualities.
Silence and stillness: Reflects the need for contemplation and introspection.
Connection to the subconscious: Points to the power of dreams, symbolism, and the unconscious mind.
The High Priestess encourages individuals to embrace their intuition and explore the depths of their inner world for spiritual growth and self-discovery.
UNIVERSAL TAROT OF MARSEILLE:
Figure 1: The orange point at the top of her hat touches the edge of the card;
Figure 2: Seventeen lines of the book are worldly;
Figure 3: Crosses on her chest;
Figure 4: Oval and white, the symbol of pregnancy, THE EGG IN THE PROCESS OF HATCHING.
thanks for this and for all of these comments. Kim is a very special person. I am so proud that she came on my show.
I was just playing around with numbers and realised that 108 is the following multiplied together…
1
2×2
3x3x3
…and if you carry on and also multiply that by the following…
4x4x4x4
5x5x5x5x5
…then you get 86,400,000, which, as I just found out, is
the number of milliseconds in a day. I’m not saying it means anything but it certainly is interesting.
Apparently they are known as hyperfactorials…a rabbit hole to go down another evening, I think!…or not at all. Probably the latter. I will just try letting this one go 😉
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperfactorial
this is so fascinating. There is something very unusual about that number for sure.
Taking 108 and applying it to numerology:
1+0+8 = 9
9 is ” often considered as the epitome of wisdom, spiritual growth, and universal love.” And more…
https://numerologycompass.com/meaning-of-number-9-in-numerolog
The experiences reported in this show were quite interesting. But putting on my rationalist hat again, I would like to remind everyone that quantum mechanics as we know it does not allow for the instantaneous transmission of information at distance. Essentially, the only thing that can be transmitted is the outcome of a random coin toss. So attributing the experiences reported in the show to quantum entanglement is at best speculative.
Spooky action at a distance is a well-known phenomenon. It does allow for instantaneous transmission of information between entangled particles.
Yes!
Indeed, it is quite well-known…
https://www.science.org/content/article/einstein-s-spooky-action-distance-spotted-objects-almost-big-enough-see
https://theconversation.com/what-is-quantum-entanglement-a-physicist-explains-the-science-of-einsteins-spooky-action-at-a-distance-191927
Spooky action as distance is very real, but can only be used to transmit the outcome of a random coin coss.
Essentially, it works as follows.
The first participant, Alice, has a particle in a quantum superposition of states, say “state 0” and “state 1”.
When she measures the state of the particle it collapses to one of the two classical states “state 0” or “state 1” (this is the “collapse of the wavefunction”, in quantum parlance). Which of the 2 outcomes is obtained is a random process (what I called the “random coin toss”).
This has an instantaneous effect on the particle in the hands of the other participant, Bob. Namely, when he measures his particle he will always obtain the same result as Alice. So Alice can indeed transmit the outcome of her random coin toss.
Now, let’s see what Alice *cannot* do. Suppose Alice has just heard about the outcomes of the European
elections on the radio, and would like to send the information to her friend Bob at the other hand of the galaxy. This would be genuine “instantaneous transmission of information at distance”, but is unfortunately not allowed by the rules of quantum mechanics.
What is perhaps even more spooky than all of this is the curious fact the the CIA spooks actually had an interest in possible quantum-mechanical explanations of parapsychology. See the following declassified document : https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79-00999A000200010009-6.pdf
Some of us have had experiences that “break the rules”! Makes life very strange and wonderful
The day we make consiousness in the lab, is the day we begin to start figuring it all out objectively. For now we are stuck with our own subjective experience…no more able to prove we are conscious, than a rock (wondering when someone will take the time to ask it, what it’s like being a rock).
Regarding the passing of information using entaglement, or spooky action at a distance, here is my explanation…Let us say I am standing on a glass floor in the dark and happen to be holding a coin…I flip the coin, which eventually settles on the floor. There is also someone on the level below me – my glass floor is their glass ceiling. Luckily we both have torches. I shine the torch down onto the coin, now resting on the floor and notice it is heads up. The person on the floor beneath me also switches on their torch, points it upwards and notes that they can see the same coin, tails down. We
both walk to the nearby stairs, where we are able to talk and compare results. As expected, we can confirm that we each saw a different side of the coin.
But however hard either of us try, we cannot figure out a way of being able to communicate any information to the other using coin flips, or indeed any series of coins flips. The only way we could transmit any information through the glass would be to use the flashlight, or hand gestures, which of course, both use light…which only works, well…at the speed of light.
Although, saying that, there is still the theoretical possibility of being able to create a wormhole (more technically known as an Einstein-Rosen bridge) through which it may be possible to transmit information. If only we knew how to artificially create a stable one!
I am not saying that transmitting information faster than light is impossible…just that we don’t know how to do it artificially in a lab…yet. But whatever the solution, it is not through the mechanism of quantum coin-tosses.
Some of us have had experiences that “break the rules”! Makes life very strange and wonderful
this is a terrific place! 🙂
My intuition tells me this was a valuable hour and a half and it also told me to buy Kim’s book. Everything she said (and Whitley also) resonates with my experiences and current awareness.