Will Trump Disclose?

Screenshot

In this wide-ranging solo outing Whitley discusses whether or not Trump will disclose, what 3I/Atlas may actually mean and much more, including why Transformation 2025 is being published now. (Kindle due out later in December, physical and audio books soon after.)

Transformation 2025 will be available in all formats later in December.

 

Will Trump Disclose? — Free Video:

24 Responses

  1. All of this is so important. I’ve been a part of this for so long. I began exploring and studying it when I was in my early teens. I’m not far behind Whitley in age. I totally understand the problems in not being credentialed. I’ve also had enough odd experiences to understand it on another level. Most recently when we took photos of the total solar eclipse here in Texas in 2024, we were astounded to see something that shouldn’t have been there in all the photos. The only person I showed them to that displayed an OMG when I showed them was a good friend whom I met through Unknown Country. I displayed them on the massage board too, and they were ignored. It was strange.

    ‘The Age of Disclosure’ was released recently and I’d like to think it’s a game changer. I do recommend that everyone here check it out…and Marco Rubio and others in the documentary have some explaining to do. Earlier in the year when Rubio became Secretary of State, I wondered if he was appointed, in part, due to his UAP ‘experience’ on The Hill. After all, the Secretary of State would be involved with diplomacy with the ‘others’ in some capacity, no? It remains to be seen if ‘The Age of Disclosure’ will have an impact, having to compete with all the distractions in the news. (Dr. Putoff’s and Dr. Davis’ discussion about how UAP’s may work is just great!)

    I’m one of those people who walks the line with the science aspects and the high strangeness of the phenomenon. I always acknowledge that we don’t know what we don’t know. I keep up as much as possible with all of it, and am involved with SCU. Many do not know that the Pentagon’s AARO held a workshop that included various organizations, including SCU this year:
    https://nuforc.org/nuforc-aaro-workshop/

    So, things are happening, but also flying below the radar for mainstream, average Americans. You might say it’s all hiding in plain sight, and people aren’t ‘grokking’ it, even if they watch ‘The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch’, which has featured Dr. Travis Taylor and Jay Stratton (Who gave the keynote speech at this year’s SCU Conference.)

    31/Atlas…is not a normal, average comet. It just isn’t, and I’m glad that Whitley mentioned it.

    1. That’s pretty much what I was going to say.

      If the Visitors want to build a golf course or hotel, or make him Emperor, he’ll be interested.

      Still, he’s probably been told something (I believe Lue Elizondo mentioned that), and I wonder what he makes of it all. He does respect those he sees as powerful, and wants to be like them.

    2. Even if Trump disclosed, many will think it is either one of his incomprehensible rants or a total lie since many of his statements have been outright lies. I would rather the pope or someone truly credible disclose.

  2. I haven’t had a chance to watch/listen to the podcast yet, but…
    1) It pains me that NASA is now “weaponizing” 31/Atlas… are they covering their a** because they know something?
    2) Trump will use anything as a political maneuver, including Disclosure, true…

  3. The title of this edition, “Will Trump Disclose?” is somewhat misleading, since most of Whitley’s comments are do not deal with that. Nevertheless, a lot of folk in the UFO community have been discussing the possibility. Frankly, one cannot raise this question in a non-political context, because practically everything in this nation is now politically polarized, particularly as relates to the current President.

    I do not regard anything the current occupant of the White House might say about anything as truthful, or other than self-serving. I am not going to debate this, although others may strongly disagree; I state it only to establish my point of view.

    I do not think the current President is capable of understanding the nature of the UFO or Visitor phenomena, and thus any “disclosure” from him would be meaningless. Likewise, I don’t think the military establishment—despite what it might have found over the years—is capable of truly understanding its nature. “Disclosure” comes from the people who have experienced the phenomenon, and who share what they know, as Whitley has done for many years.

    1. Seconding your comments.

      As Whitley has been suggesting, disclosure is not likely to be one monumental moment when the government tells us something or the Visitors land on the White House lawn in front of the cameras. It seems to be happening very gradually and inexorably, every day, so that we all are getting more and more accustomed to the idea that Someone Else is here with us.

      Which should somewhat reduce the problem of ontological shock, I suppose, and keep us from being overwhelmed and paralyzed. Perhaps we’ll even be so used to thinking about Them that any dramatic disclosure will bring a collective shrug?

      The current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave does not seem to think about anything very deeply, and is having serious cognitive issues (leaving aside his tenuous relationship with truth), so would not be the best exponent for Them to use, no matter what else happens.

      “Take me to your leader” always crosses my mind in this context. To whom would we take them? Seriously? Who do we have on this planet who could actually handle that job?

  4. However difficult it is for the Government or NASA to disclose, if the presence comes forth first, it will be so much worse for them trying to justify their lies.

    I do not blame them: as Whitley has written, the Visitors played them and put them on this road, from which they have not had the self-control and independence to escape. Perhaps it is a test the Visitors orchestrated to judge them? Humanity deserves the truth, “Thou shalt not lie.”

    Any race viewing humanity from outside of our bubble would be disgusted with the state of our world, but there are many good people who still live with Love as their guiding principle. Lord have Mercy.

  5. I just viewed the podcast and it was great! Privately, I call these “Whitley’s Riffs”, and I think they would be a wonderful addition to the Dreamland line-up, say once a month or once every two months… pick a theme and let Whitley loose on the topic!
    I haven’t seen “Age of Disclosure”, but I watched Richard Dolan’s Intelligent Disclosure on YouTube and think that the film will probably be worth seeing at some point. As usual, there are no Experiencers in the film. I find that very sad, but it seems to be just the way things are, as though If any Experiencer was included, it would somehow bring about a lack of credibility.
    I am looking forward to the publication of “Transformation 2025” and will be ordering a copy as soon as it is available!

  6. Whitley, I located my book …TRANSFORMATION…after watching…Will Trump Disclose?…When I opened the book there was a note I had put there after reading it many years ago. The note reads…NINE KNOCKS…THREE EACH…START AT END OF CHAPTER ELEVEN. This was a wonderful book with so much to contemplate, YET, the nine knocks seemed to be significant and a reminder of how important it was for me after reading the book. On page 129 YOU WROTE, “I returned to Dr. Gliedman’s essay.” “I read the following sentence: The mind is not the playwright of reality.” “At that moment there came a knocking on the side of the house. This was a substantial noise, very regular and sharp. The knocks were so exactly spaced that they sounded like they were being produced by a machine. Both cats were riveted with terror. They stared at the wall. The knocks went on, nine of them in three groups of three, followed by a tenth lighter double-knock that communicated an impression of finality.” Pages 130 and 131 plus more in the book also refer to this. I will continue reading from chapter eleven on.

    Nikola Tesla’s 369 theory ???
    Does the key to the universe lay in numbers? When you are a genius, you tend to notice things that others do not. Nikola Tesla did. He envisioned the potential of electricity, the power of AC, far before his contemporaries. So, is it possible that Nikola Tesla’s 3 6 9 theory of the universe holds water? Or is it merely evidence of Tesla’s obsessive nature? His obsession began with the fixation on the number three — and suggested that three, six, and nine could hold the key to the universe.

    1. I had the singular most disturbing dream of my childhood, aged five, that culminated in nine knocks (three sets of three) at the back door…just after seeing what looked, to my young eyes, as the devil flying around the house. He was looking right at me, laughing…mocking me.

      It surprises me to this day that I open that door in the dream…but when I opened it and poked my head out into the dark, there was nothing there.

      I have heard it said, that the nine knocks are supposed to represent a call to higher consciousness. Maybe that dream was trying to tell me, that in essence, our fears are self-generated…that there is only ever us there, no devil, just us? I don’t know.

      If it was indeed a call to higher econsciousness, then from whom…surely not a five year old?

      One more thing…the face of this devil, as frightening as it was to me at the time, was just like something from a pantomime. Colourful, yet grotesque…very much like one of the masks on the cover of “Passport to Magonia”. Maybe a layered meaning for me to `get` many years later?

      Anyway CAROLLEE, the way my mind works, I see page 129 as 1 and 2+9=11, or the equivalent of 111.
      Knock, knock, knock.

  7. I would also like to add that the 3i Atlas media is part of the coverup and disinformation project! At its basis is that something slower than light would be spending many millions of years to get here. Meanwhile there is a vast array of ET beings and material as well as PSI tech here already.

    1. I stumbled on some of this recently. I’m not a comet expert by any means, so I can’t comment on the astrophysics involved, but one thing I absolutely recognized was the vitriol directed towards Loeb from within his own professional community. I don’t necessarily think he’s correct, but the push back from his peers seems hate-filled. Therefore, fear based.

  8. Getting back to disclosure: It should not be left up to an American president, whatever party, to make that decision. Disclosure affects the entire world, not just the USA. Many other nations have the same ‘high strangeness’ going on as we do. (If you know nothing more than Jacques Vallee’s books, you know that is true.) The extreme secrecy between nations on this must end. The world MUST come together on this. If nothing else, the United Nations should make a formal announcement, even if it means that the aerospace and defense industries can no longer make sweet deals about ‘alien’ technology. It’s disgusting and not in the best interest of humankind.

    For a very detailed explanation of the ‘bubble’ technology that is possibly used and described by Hall Putoff and Eric Davis in ‘The Age of Disclosure’, go here:

    https://asirpjournal.substack.com/p/age-of-disclosure-the-bubble-explained
    If true, think of what this could mean. Sunbow, I think you will find this fascinating, and way beyond ‘speed of light’ travel taking millions of years.

  9. The arc of this week’s Dreamland is a 30-minute statement, a treatise even, on the fact that disclosure, and the entirety of the Visitor reality, is not in our control. They have repeatedly come directly to us, and we’ve been shown how to reach out to them, but it is always on their terms. Fine, because, well, that’s been my actual experience. As Whitley has said before, if disclosure happens, the Visitors are in control, and it will be in an almost unbelievably smart and clever way.

    But even knowing that, I still get my feathers ruffled and senses sharpened every time there’s a new claim of disclosure. I somehow still, after all these decades, get a sense of validation when the government and scientific community publicly recognize the UAP/Visitor story as being just the tiniest bit real. Only to be disappointed yet again.

    Disappointed by the control of the message, the commoditization, monetization, the character assassinations, and the dismissal of the message. A message intended for each of us, that is gobbled up by yet another UFO Bro and their podcast. And of course, a podcast that is perpetually in the top-10 of any search engine by design.

    Thankfully, my indulgence in reports of upcoming “official” reveals is waning precipitously. Because, the fact that this is about us as individuals sinks in a little more every day. If I think about it, maybe that’s been the plan all along.

    1. I’m clicking on their garbage less and less. And yes, I fall for clickbait as much as the next person. Or at least did, as I’m beginning to see the pointlessness of the vast majority of what is being force fed to us via a landing page. God forbid if it’s Facebook. They’re the worst.

      I have a sense of calm and focus of late in regards to this supposed reveal. Mostly because the revelatory claims haven’t come to fruition despite their hard dates and so called evidence. Forgoing those holding signs scrawled with predictions of the future reminds me of the zealots in the French Quarter when I was a kid in the ’70s…”Just ignore them and keep on walkin’, little dude. Keep on walkin’.”

Leave a Reply